Time out ran a few articles this month on the subject of London's peculiar relationship with the bicycle.
inevitably there was a 'for' and 'against' spread...
'Don't pity the cyclist, snarls Michael Hodges' being the latter.
i realise (of just 'hope') that this is all tongue in cheek, but hell...
the 'argument' seemed to centre around us hooligans riding on the pavement, which to me was a bit of a non-starter anyway, as of all the things we get blamed for that one is the most ridiculous. i see very few dedicated commuters carrying out such an act.
but the main thrust of the discourse was how london was a city to wander around in and 'think'.
it seems 'thinking' involves carelessly stepping out into the road with scant regard for your own of others safety.
'London is also a city for nipping across the road and between cars; impossible when silent bicyclists come charging through the gaps at speed.' well.. pardon me, but ummmm... couldn't you use your eyes? and perhaps demonstrate some of that great london thinking and exercise common sense?
in fact, the bit that got me the most, was this little gem...
'the worship of the body rather than the brain, which is fundamental to cycling'. i should start by saying that i'm by no means an athlete, i like lager, lager likes making big bellies, i should stop smoking, i eat too much, i don't give a hoot about my optimum heart rate (unless it reaches my 'optimum' and results in death) but most of all, the big bug... it does exercise my brain, continually, from when i climb on to when i arrive at my destination, i never feel as awake and aware as when i'm on my bike. i have to be, to avoid pricks like you Mr Hodges.
p.s. the comments section is the most heartening read...
